Trump poised to fire US attorney for resisting effort to charge NY AG Letitia James: Sources

Administrator

Administrator
Staff member
Apr 20, 2025
986
218
43

Trump poised to fire US attorney for resisting effort to charge NY AG Letitia James: Sources

68cd465e59677.jpg


U.S. Attorney's Job at Risk for Not Prosecuting New York Attorney General

The U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia is on the cusp of losing his job due to his refusal to press charges against the New York Attorney General, Letitia James. His office had been instructed to look into allegations of mortgage fraud against James, but any evidence of wrongdoing had proven elusive.

Despite the lack of clear proof that James had committed mortgage fraud when buying a house in Virginia, the U.S. Attorney, Erik Siebert, was pressured to file criminal charges against her. There was a considerable pushback when Siebert refused to take this action without substantial evidence.

Job Termination Could Lead to Crisis

Letting go of Siebert could lead to significant disruption in one of the country's most noteworthy attorney offices, which regularly handles national security cases, including espionage and terrorism. This move could also escalate worries about the alleged misuse of the Department of Justice to target political opponents.

Appointed to his position by the President, Siebert has been informed that he may be replaced with someone more willing to aggressively pursue an investigation into James. This shift signifies an intensification of what many critics deem a campaign of retribution against political adversaries.

Political Tensions Rise

James, who has successfully sued the President for civil fraud and is leading several lawsuits challenging his administration's policies, has been accused of being "biased and corrupt." She has been repeatedly accused of targeting the President for political reasons, with the President claiming she's "a horror show" who wanted to go after him before she even knew anything about him.

After a three-month trial, a judge in New York found that the President and his family had committed business fraud over a decade by inflating the value of their properties to secure favorable loan terms. The court imposed a fine of nearly half a billion dollars on the President and his sons. Although an appeals court dismissed the financial penalty, it upheld the finding of fraud.

Details of the Alleged Mortgage Fraud

Officials argue that James committed mortgage fraud because a document related to her home purchase allegedly falsely indicated the property would be her primary residence. The investigation was initiated after a criminal referral about James was sent to the Department of Justice.

One of the key pieces of evidence, a limited power of attorney form used by James' niece to sign documents on her behalf, was not considered by the loan officers who approved the mortgage, according to investigators.

Background on U.S. Attorney Siebert

Siebert, a former police officer with the Metropolitan Police Department in Washington, D.C., earned his law degree in 2009 and has been an assistant United States attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia since 2010. He has held various positions in the office, including leading the office's organized drug crime task force and supervising the office's Richmond division.

Following the resignation of the previous office head, Siebert started serving as the interim U.S. Attorney. He was recommended for the position by both of Virginia’s Democratic senators, and the President nominated him for the position. After his 120-day term as interim U.S. Attorney ended, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia unanimously agreed to extend Siebert's tenure.

The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, one of the most high-profile federal prosecutors' offices in the country, serves over six million people with a staff of 300 prosecutors. It often handles significant terrorism and intelligence-related cases due to its proximity to Washington and the multiple government offices in its jurisdiction.

 
Pressuring a prosecutor to file charges without evidence is a slippery slope—this really undermines trust in the whole justice system. Does anyone think Congress will actually step in?
 
If Congress doesn't push back, the message is basically that whoever's in power can just weaponize the justice system whenever they feel threatened. That's pretty scary for anyone, no matter your politics. We've seen what happens in other countries where prosecutors have to answer to politicians—never ends well. How much pressure does it actually take for Congress to act on something like this?