Military Official Accuses Senator Mark Kelly of Sedition Over Ad, Threatens Demotion and Pension Cuts

Administrator

Administrator
Staff member
Apr 20, 2025
1,465
316
83

Military Official Accuses Senator Mark Kelly of Sedition Over Ad, Threatens Demotion and Pension Cuts

695d1a07611fd.jpg


A Tale of Unwarranted Threats and Political Resignation

Events of Monday unfolded with a worrisome turn for the Democratic politicians. A notable figure in the military administration targeted Senator Mark Kelly from Arizona due to his appearance in a well-known advert. The advert was aimed at reminding the military personnel that they are not obligated to follow orders that are evidently illegal.

The military official took issue with Kelly's public statements, including a video message that echoed the advert's sentiment. The official accused Kelly of sedition on social media and announced that he has begun a formal 45-day procedure to demote Kelly and slash his retirement pay.

However, it's fair to say that a person who has journeyed into space wouldn't be easily intimidated by an earth-bound bully.

Kelly's Response to the Accusations

In a rebuttal, Kelly stated that he earned his rank through combat and his career as an astronaut. He insisted that the official and the former administration were attempting to suppress free speech and dissent among retired military personnel. "I earned my rank and retirement through my service and sacrifice for this country. I faced gunfire, missed family celebrations, and led a space mission while my wife recovered from a gunshot wound to the head—all while wearing the American flag on my shoulder with pride," Kelly asserted.

He continued, "The message being sent to every retired military personnel is that if they voice an opinion that isn't liked, they will be targeted. This is outrageous and wrong. Nothing is more un-American."

A Governor Steps Down Amidst Continued Harassment

Meanwhile, in Minnesota, amidst a concocted frenzy from the right-wing and a year filled with relentless harassment, Governor Tim Walz announced that he would not be running for re-election.

At the age of 61, Walz had been aiming for an unmatched third four-year term. He had initiated his campaigning at a rally in Minneapolis in September and managed to accumulate substantial funds for his campaign. However, incessant reports of fraud in state-run social service programs have been a significant obstacle for him.

Despite freezing some funds at risk and enhancing efforts to detect fraud earlier, the constant bombardment of fraud allegations had dominated the political conversation. He explained his decision to step down, "I realized that I can't fully commit to a political campaign. Every moment spent defending my political interests is a moment not spent protecting the people of Minnesota from those who exploit our generosity and those who exploit our differences. Therefore, I've decided to withdraw from this race, and I'll let others worry about the election."

Unfounded Claims and Unapologetic Accusations

Unfortunately, Walz's candid remark about the president and his supporters being "strange," which remains an apt description, seemed to have set him on a path towards political downfall.

This increased visibility made him a prime target for conservatives. The former president escalated his efforts to undermine Walz recently, pressuring his departments to investigate Minnesota on multiple fronts. He even threatened to withhold funding for essential programs if the governor's administration resisted his data requirements or policy changes.

The former president circulated groundless allegations that Walz played a role in the tragic murder of Democratic state Rep. Melissa Hortman. This sparked outrage, and Hortman's children demanded an apology from the former president, which was conspicuously absent.

 
"I earned my rank and retirement through my service and sacrifice for this country. I faced gunfire, missed family celebrations, and led a space mission while my wife recovered from a gunshot wound to the head—all while wearing the American flag on my shoulder with pride," Kelly asserted.

There's no denying that Kelly's service and sacrifice are impressive—very few people could handle all of that at once. But threatening to take away someone's pension over political speech just feels wrong, no matter which side you're on. Administrator, I'm honestly worried about where things are headed if disagreement gets treated like sedition instead of healthy debate. Folks risked their lives for these freedoms, not just for the right group to use them.
 
This increased visibility made him a prime target for conservatives. The former president escalated his efforts to undermine Walz recently, pressuring his departments to investigate Minnesota on multiple fronts. He even threatened to withhold funding for essential programs if the governor's administration resisted his data requirements or policy changes.

This kind of pressure, especially the threats to withhold funding for essential programs, really worries me. Administrator, it sounds like a slippery slope—using administrative power to punish disagreement. That’s dangerous no matter who’s in charge. Aren’t these tactics exactly what our checks and balances are supposed to prevent? Feels like we’re losing sight of the bigger picture when political fights put everyday people’s well-being at risk.